|
|
|
Naming & TM Selection Book | Sample Sections
Text of sample sections from The Art of Naming:
NEONYM Creative Guide to Selecting Names and Trademarks. Many trademark-related
and linguistic terms in these sections are defined in the Glossaries
in the book and on this site.
30. Semantic Positioning
After inventorying successful marks in your trade,
profession, or industry to see what kinds are viable, you can test
your initial selections against successful marks. This test helps determine
whether your selection semantically compares well with already-successful
marks. For instance, if launching
a new heavy duty pickup truck you might compare your candidate mark against
DODGE RAM, FORD F-150, and CHEVROLET SILVERADO to see whether your mark
semantically conveys similar feelings of strength, power, speed, and
reliability. You wouldn't want a mark semantically "weaker" in
relation to those essential product qualities.
When establishing a niche in an already established
market, you want to semantically position your mark into that niche,
whether the niche lies at the end or middle of the product spectrum. For
instance, if launching a new sneaker brand, you should consider the
broad spectrum of existing brand names, ranging from the fanciful KEDS and
ADIDAS; the arbitrary CONVERSE and SKECHERS (derived from a
street slang word for a person who can't sit still); the suggestive PUMA
and REEBOK (from "rhebok," an African antelope); and the almost descriptive NEW
BALANCE and CREATIVE RECREATION.
Semantic positioning is obviously important when
entering a mature market, when it's important to create a mark that
helps establish a niche or compete in broad market segments. But such positioning is also
important when being the first to offer a new kind of product. In
the latter situation, you may want words, taglines, or slogans that
connote your first entry into the market, or product marks like
VELCRO and CROAKIES that, without becoming generic, are widely
identified with the product, thus leaving little room for competitors.
Semantic positioning is arguably one of the most
important considerations in naming. In many situations it may
be the most important.
58. Word
Order
Word order can be important because it affects meaning,
rhythm, and dominance, among other factors. For example, with rhythm, when
the mark consists of two names, the one with more syllables more often
appears first. E.g., compare the rhythmic effects of the following:
MERCEDES
BENZ BENZ
MERCEDES
PACKARD
BELL BELL
PACKARD
MONTGOMERY
WARD WARD
MONTGOMERY
PRENTICE-HALL HALL-PRENTICE
HARCOURT
BRACE BRACE
HARCOURT
However, where the two names are separated by "and," the
rhythm and word order often changes and the name with fewer syllables
may appear first, e.g., cf.:
SMITH & WESSON WESSON & SMITH
MARKS & SPENCERS SPENCERS & MARKS
BLACK & DECKER DECKER & BLACK
TOM & JERRY JERRY & TOM
ABBOTT & COSTELLO COSTELLO & ABBOTT
GILBERT & SULLIVAN SULLIVAN & GILBERT
Changing word order can move a mark away from the
descriptive toward the distinctive. Compare:
CLUB
MED MED
CLUB
SAKS
FIFTH AVENUE FIFTH
AVENUE SAKS
TEAM
FROG FROG
TEAM
Changing word order allows you to place the more
distinctive word first and thus make the mark stronger. Cf.:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH FITCH & ABERCROMBIE
LOCKHEED
MARTIN MARTIN
LOCKHEED
JUSTERNINI & BROOKS BROOKS & JUSTERNINI
In most languages word order has no symmetry, as
far as meaning is concerned. HARD
ROCK is not equivalent to ROCK HARD nor COLD STONE synonymous with STONE
COLD. But even if some equivalent meaning can be achieved in reversing
word order, especially by adding or subtracting a preposition between
the words, the semantics almost always will be different. Compare:
DAIRY
QUEEN QUEEN
OF DAIRY
BURGER
KING KING
OF BURGERS
MASTERMIND MINDMASTER
In devising marks consisting of surnames, one should
usually avoid a word order which makes the mark seem like a single
proper name. Compare:
SMITH
BARNEY BARNEY
SMITH
LOCKHEED
MARTIN MARTIN
LOCKHEED
NEIMAN
MARCUS MARCUS
NEIMAN
McDONELL
DOUGLAS DOUGLAS
McDONELL
Finally, with two words having equal number of syllables
the first consonant and vowel sound may dictate word order, assuming
semantic factors, which ordinarily have priority, don't dictate the
reverse. E.g., in most
cases where semantics doesn't dictate placement, the word with the shorter
vowel sound will come first, as with ricochet words (P 205 below). Note
HARRY AND DAVID'S and even NEIMAN MARCUS, where the AR sound is only
slightly longer than the EI sound. In contrast, the stronger, more
plosive consonant may demand first placement. Compare BILL AND
WILL vs. WILL AND BILL. Arguably BILL should come first. Of
course, there are exceptions to these prevailing word orders, especially
when flow of sound will control. MAC & JAC is easier to say
than JAC & MAC because the "N" sound in & is slightly
awkward when immediately followed by the "M" sound in MAC.
132. Fanciful,
Capricious Marks
Consider fanciful and capricious marks,
i.e., marks having no real meaning in any language, such as KODAK,
VELCRO, PROZAC, BRILLO, TEFLON, EXXON or HAeAGEN-DAZS. These marks often become strong and
distinctive, though initially it takes more advertising dollars to tell
customers which products are offered with the fanciful mark. By
making up unusual new "words" (i.e., "neologisms")
you not only create strong, distinctive marks but often avoid problems
with conflicting marks, unless, e.g., by some chance your fanciful mark
happens to look or sound like some other mark. (Note that because
of "soundalike" considerations, simple, shorter, fanciful marks
may actually be harder to clear for registration than arbitrary marks
having unrelated meaning. E.g., JETTA (fanciful) sounds like GETA,
GEDDA, and JEDDA, whereas PLATYPUS (arbitrary) would probably not be
mistaken for anything else.)
Even though initially you will probably spend more
on advertising a fanciful mark to make it known, the long range results
often justify increased initial expenses. Compared to a more descriptive mark
which tells the consumer something about the products, the more-expensive-to-establish
fanciful mark, once established, is usually commercially and legally
stronger, more distinctive, more difficult to challenge, and less likely
to be confused with competitive descriptive terminology. Another
advantage of a coined word like EXXON, KODAK, and CEMEX is that it is
neither noun, adjective, or verb and thus capable of all the associations
with the products that any part of speech might have. It provides
the maximum voltage for the spark of imagination to leap from mark to
product and back.
One way to generate ideas for a new word is to use
a random word generator. A
much better technique is to create a fanciful composite word whose components
are derived from product qualities. (See Composite
Marks, P 174 below.)
166. Changed
Letters
A technique for creating an interesting mark is to
change one letter of an ordinary word or a pre-existing name or mark. When
the ordinary word is related to the product, that's a plus; if the
result is amusing or clever, that, too, may be helpful. Though Kashi is
also a Middle Eastern surname, a possible example is KASHI for breakfast
cereal, U.S. Reg. No. 1,366,934, which is one letter away from "kasha,"
an Eastern European cooked dish made from hulled or crushed grain, e.g.,
a buckwheat mush. Also note U.S. Reg. No. 1,967,683 for TUSHION
covering sports and recreational cushions, derived from "cushion" and
"tush" which is slang for rear end. LINUX is one letter away from
LINUS, the first name of its originator Linus Torvalds, and the more
common DANNY'S became the successful DENNY'S. Imaginatively, CINGULAR,
one letter away from singular, is related to the Latin words "cingula,"
meaning belt or girdle, and "cingulum," a zone on the earth, each connoting
the terrestrial nature of the CINGULAR telephone network service. ECCO
for shoes is one letter away from ECHO and ECCE, "behold" in Latin. Though
IKEA supposedly originated from the names of the founder and of his property
and village (Ingvar Kamprad Elmtaryd Agunnaryd),
the mark has been promoted with awareness that IKEA is one letter away
from IDEA, even per the wording "the IKEA idea." Do SNICKERS and
SCRABBLE gain energy by respectively being one letter away from SNACKERS
and SCRAMBLE? If the changed letter is merely a soundalike of the replaced
one, the result may not be as striking or imaginative, as with INFINITI
in lieu of INFINITY.
197. Obscure
Words.
You can derive an almost-fanciful mark that has linguistic
and semantic roots by finding an obscure word, e.g., by perusing the
complete edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. If the
word suggests the product, that's a plus; even if not, you may
have an unusual arbitrary mark. Examples of registered
marks are VIRAGO (an heroic or manlike woman)(U.S. Reg. No. 2,199,841
for books); ZANTE (European smoke-tree wood) (U.S. Reg. No. 2,399,171
for footwear); TONDO (a circular painting or carving)(U.S. Reg. No. 2,348,526
for books); CYLIX (a shallow-stemmed two-handled drinking cup)(U.S. Reg.
No. 1,212,734 for data transmission and computer programming services);
and OBELUS (a sign used in ancient manuscripts to mark suspect, corrupt
or spurious words or passages) (U.S. Reg. No. 2,259,241 for stainless
steel flatware). Such unusual marks tend to be distinctive and
less likely to conflict with other marks, especially in relation to meaning.
Less arcane, but sometime apt, are "fossil" words, i.e., obsolete
words which, like a crab in a shell, only survive within idiomatic expressions,
such as "fettle" which only used occurs within the expression "in
fine fettle." KITH, as in "kith and kin," is a trademark
example, as is SPIC AND SPAN. Though fossil words can be distinctive,
their advantage may be lost unless used arbitrarily or otherwise
imaginatively.
Still somewhat obscure, but less so than "fossil" words, are "jargon" words
and expressions. Jargon is vocabulary peculiar to a particular
trade, industry, occupation, profession or similar group, for example,
legal jargon like "sua sponte" (meaning "of his/her own
volition") or military jargon like "alpha strike." If
jargon words spark imagination, like the mark EVENT HORIZON, so much
the better. Otherwise, to be effective, a less imaginative mark like
FORCE MULTIPLIER must be used arbitrarily or very imaginatively. After
all, jargon terms by their very nature can be dull and lifeless.
241. Symmetry
They say a symmetrical face
may be more handsome or beautiful yet perhaps less interesting. The same is partially true of designs. Examples
of symmetric designs are the CBS eye, U.S. Reg. No. 645,893; the Wool
Bureau's wool content symbol, U.S. Reg. No. 790,140; the Purina
checkerboard, U.S. Reg. No. 930,599; the BASS beer triangle, U.S. Reg.
No. 1,926,947; and marks using the infinity symbol, the number 8, or
the letter H. Although these marks may be more visually static,
they can be more "timeless" and durable. (See Timeless Designs, P
273 below.) I.e.,
they can be more iconic and symbolic. By flowing curves or bold
contrasts the symmetrical mark may still retain visual activity, as per
the wool content, checkerboard, number 8, and infinity symbol marks mentioned
above.
The most timeless and iconic are designs that are
both horizontally and vertically symmetric, like those described above. A mark symmetric
in only one dimension is generally less powerful though sometimes more
expressive. Compare the fully symmetric H design used by Hannah
Creations, Inc. for jewelry (U.S. Reg. No. 2,782,146) to the vertically
symmetric HONDA "H" (U.S. Reg. No. 2,651,962), or the fully symmetric
"8" in V-8 to the horizontally symmetric "3" in 3M. Or compare
the Roman numerals II and V.
Symmetric designs, particularly fully symmetric,
are better suited for house marks since they radiate an aura of stability
via their balance and inertia. Also the fully symmetric design
is generally more compatible with a conservative business image.
244. Orientation
The
direction a mark faces may have a subtle or even profound effect. (Cf. Gravity,
P 246 below.) Right
vs. left orientation should be considered whenever a choice arises. Clearly
this phenomenon applies to word marks because they read left
to right in most languages, but it also applies to designs since most
designs used on labels, packaging, advertising, letterhead, and business
cards appear on the left or center, encouraging the mark's rightward
orientation or movement. Rightward and upward orientations are
metaphorically positive, alive, and forward-looking; leftward and downward
can be otherwise. ("Left" in Latin is "sinister"; in French it's
"gauche.")
Notice with coinage designs that busts of dead figures
(presidents or monarchs) tend to face left while those alive tend right.** To
be "positive" and forward looking, designs showing wheelchairs almost
invariably face right, e.g., U.S. Reg. Nos. 2,322,919 and 1,714,499. Some
designs are registered both ways, with the right-facing isotope usually
being the more "friendly." Cf. U.S. Reg. Nos. 2,352,951 and 2,352,943
for left- and right-facing moon crescents used for bakery goods and U.S.
Reg. Nos. 2,617,369 and 2,630,709 for left- and right-facing equine designs
for horse registry services.
305. Sound
Marks
Distinctive sound marks usually consist of a short
series of individual notes, alone or with chords, often mid-range notes
played on a single instrument. Cf. the NBC chimes (U.S. Reg. No. 916,522) and the
"INTEL INSIDE" sound bite (U.S. Reg. No. 2,315,261). Sometimes
words accompany the sounds as with U.S. Reg. No. 2,369,787 owned by Glaxo
Wellcome, Inc. for a mark consisting of "the melody notes E flat,
F, B flat in octave below, B flat, followed by the spoken words of 'BREAKTHROUGH
MEDICINES FOR EVERYDAY LIVING' and a musical chord consisting of the
melody notes E flat and E flat in two octaves."
Animal
noises are also possible subject matter, e.g., the roar of the old MGM
lion (U.S. Reg. No. 1,395,550). More unusual marks are being developed,
even sounds from exhaust pipes used to advertise motorcycles. Nonetheless,
such unusual marks, unless cleverly employed, will be hard to protect
and less distinctive, especially if somewhat descriptive.
Even
where sound is not necessarily registerable, it can be part of the branding
strategy. E.g., supposedly JAGUAR car engine sounds are designed
to complement the JAGUAR name and design.
|
|
|